States could learn from Baird's infrastructure model: ISNBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | MONDAY, 24 JUN 2013 12:15PMThe New South Wales government's innovative infrastructure funding model will be in the interests of industry super funds, according to director of government relations at the Industry Super Network (ISN) Matthew Linden. |
Editor's Choice
Key advice executive leaves Aware Super
Aware Super has farewelled its group executive of advice.
ASIC calls out sloppy adviser data
ASIC is reprimanding AFS licensees (AFSL) for submitting inaccurate information about their financial advisers and will ramp up its enforcement from August.
BlackRock acquires Preqin in $4.8bn deal
BlackRock will acquire Preqin in a US$3.2 billion cash deal, a move it says will transform its private markets capabilities.
Australian Retirement Trust delivers 11.3% in FY24
Australian Retirement Trust (ART) returned 11.3% p.a. for its High Growth option for the 2024 financial year.
Products
Expert Feed
Featured Profile
![Shail Singh Shail Singh](https://media.financialstandard.com.au/prod/media/library/Contacts/yqmjchgb-0002_featured_profile.png)
Shail Singh
LEAD INVESTMENT AND ADVICE OMBUDSMAN
AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY
AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY
To be successful as Australian Financial Complaints Authority's (AFCA) lead ombudsman for investments and advice, one requires empathy, impartiality, and rationality. Shail Singh shares how he also uses legal and financial advice expertise to help consumers, small businesses, and member firms. Karren Vergara writes.
Read my letter to the AFR, 20/6/2013, page 47
Energy costs take a toll on roading charges
Treasurer Baird wants to fund the first stage of WestConnex from asset sales (equals taxpayer money) and then wait for traffic counts so that a publicly owned toll road company can issue bonds against toll revenue. Which toll revenue?
Estimates after stage one would be as risky because no one knows what the traffic would be in stage two, not to mention stage three.
Granted, the risk is spread over many years but there is a rub. As we are burning our finite oil reserves, the remaining oil is less productive to produce. A recent energy outlook of the US department of Energy estimated that US shale oil until 2040 - the timelines for a tollway - is the equivalent of just 10 months of global oil demand but require more than 200,000 wells. Syncrude from tar sands, oil from deep or even ultra-deep water and oil from maturing giant fields with horizontal wells and enhanced oil recovery, all cost a lot in input energy and money.
High oil prices reflect this situation. For an economy just to stay even, productivity in the use of oil would have to compensate for the loss in productivity to produce this oil.
Tollways dependent on a slow transition from gas-guzzlers to fuel efficient cars cannot neutralize the impact of a three to four-fold increase in oil prices. Only car-pooling can do that. But that would kill all tollway operators unless tolls are charged per passenger. Good luck.
Traffic projections of four road tunnels were embellished because planners did not do the above productivity calculations.
Instead, their models calculated that higher oil prices would be absorbed by a growing, general inflation and purchasing power index.
This has turned out to be an untested assumption. So there is no future for toll-ways